A shortlist of people who can already do the job, with the evidence on each one written down. You read it and decide who to see.
People already holding live relationships inside authorities like yours.
Tony Goodwin, founder
SaaS, cyber & AI·MSPs & IT services·Financial & insurance services·Professional services·Marketing & creative·Manufacturing & industrial·Construction & built environment·Logistics & supply chain·Energy & environmental·Facilities & contracts·Medical & life sciences·Food, drink & FMCG·Education & public sector·UK, US & Australia
“I have a mistrust of recruiters, but you’ve restored my faith in the value of getting the right hire.”
“Absolutely delighted with the hires we’ve made. The screening was first class and we had amazing candidates to choose from.”
“After 2 bad hires and months of lost opportunities, you found us an amazing Head of Sales — they’re 140% of quota.”
Here’s each one, and what we do about it.
You’ll get applications from people who understand the sector and have never sold into it. Commissioning is a closed, relationship-led market with a long entry curve, and the handful of people already inside it are employed.
We map who currently holds commissioning relationships in your authorities, and approach them individually. You get that map free, before you commit to anything.
| 1 | A. Whitworth | Surrey | Currently selling into local authority SEND commissioning. Holds live relationships across several authorities. |
| 2 | J. Ferris | Manchester | Framework and DPS routes, with tender authorship rather than contribution. |
| 3 | S. Bracken | Leeds | Came from provision delivery into BD. Can defend quality in a commissioner meeting. |
| 4 | D. Mallory | Birmingham | MAT-side rather than LA. Different buying cycle, transferable with ramp. |
Yours free, whether you use us or not.
There are dozens of genuinely useful candidates in this market, not thousands, and every provider wants them. Nearly nine in ten smaller businesses say they can’t match the salaries larger organisations offer — on a job board, that’s exactly what you’re competing on.
We market the role properly. Every person we approach gets a page built for the role and addressed to them by name, with a video explaining the business, what the job actually involves and who it suits. It’s the difference between being pitched at and being made a case to.
“Absolutely delighted with the hires we’ve made. The screening was first class and we had amazing candidates to choose from.”
Gary Hall — Managing Director, TQ EnvironmentalNot sure if this is on your radar, but it felt worth putting in front of you.
Anyone who wants a short cycle. Commissioning takes as long as it takes.
A real page, sent to one person, by name.
Interviewing is a separate skill to the job. Some people are polished because they’ve done a lot of interviews, not because they’re any good. Others are awkward in a room and would be the best hire you make this year. And every CV now arrives with an AI polish on it, so the ones that read best aren’t necessarily the best people. You come away feeling reasonably sure — but feeling sure and having evidence aren’t the same thing, and only one of them survives month five.
A long screening interview, conducted by someone who has sold in your market, then a written suitability report on every candidate we recommend — scored against your brief, with the evidence underneath. And a section called Watch Points, where we set out what isn’t proven.
| Commissioning relationships held today | Strong | 9.0 |
| Sector and statutory literacy | Strong | 9.0 |
| Frameworks and procurement portals | Strong | 8.5 |
| Tender and bid authorship | Good | 7.5 |
| Multi-academy trust channel | Partial | 6.0 |
Thirty CVs to read, eight people to see, half of them a waste of an afternoon. And you’re doing it around the day job, which is why the role has been open five weeks already.
You see the ones worth seeing, and nobody else. No padding a shortlist to make it look busy, and no thirty CVs to sift. The questions worth asking are already written down, because they came out of what we couldn’t close on the screening call.
Five weeks in, the person you wanted takes a counter-offer, or mentions a competing process nobody knew about, or turns out to have been thousands off on salary the whole way through.
We establish what it’ll take to land someone before you meet them — what they’re on, what they’d move for, whether they’re being pulled toward your role or pushed out of their current one, and what else they’re in process on.
Target detail. She carries a number today but wouldn’t disclose it. Get it on the table before an offer conversation, not after.
Which is the expensive one. You’ve paid a fee, paid five months of salary, lost the ground for half a year, and you’re back where you started with less confidence than before.
If they leave, or you exit them, within six months, we run the search again at no fee. But the real protection is upstream: Watch Points exist so the risks are on the table before you hire, not discovered in month five.
| Commissioning relationships held | Weak | 4.0 |
| Frameworks and procurement | Weak | 4.0 |
Commercial and operational hires for a business scaling on local authority trust.
“After 2 bad hires and months of lost opportunities, you found us an amazing Head of Sales that not only is a perfect cultural fit, they’re 140% of quota.”
“The quality and speed of the process has been outstanding. I have a mistrust of recruiters, but you’ve restored my faith in the value of getting the right hire.”
Where the buyer is an officer, the money is public, and the route in is a framework.
Providers, edtech and suppliers selling into the public purse.
SEND, alternative provision and social care. Case officers, commissioning teams and finance. Spend is driven by statutory duty, and the sale is won on provision quality as much as price.
Central procurement at trust level, multi-school rollout, and a budget cycle that governs everything. A different buying committee to the local authority, and a different sale.
Dynamic purchasing systems, invitations to tender and portal-gated buying. Bid authorship is a distinct and genuinely scarce skill.
We’re usually brought in for a commercial hire. Then, once we know how the business works and what it takes to succeed in it, clients ask us about the roles around it.
The method doesn’t change. The criteria still come from your brief, and where the assessment needs technical depth we bring in someone from our bench who has done that job.
One client has had us fill four roles across commercial and operations. Another started with a Head of Sales and is now three roles into a technical team. If we can’t assess something properly, we’ll say so rather than take it on.
Most clients start here. We ask for 21 days' exclusivity so we can invest properly in the search rather than race three other agencies to the same active candidates.
If the person leaves, or you exit them, within six months of starting, we run the search again at no fee.
If the market for the brief isn’t there at the package you’re offering, you’ll hear it early — and we’d rather send three people we’d back than four to fill a shortlist.
Full terms confirmed in writing before any search begins.
Tony Goodwin has built, scaled and exited B2B businesses — selling them himself — and spent the years since rebuilding the commercial function inside more than 170 companies. He designed the way we screen, and he still runs searches.
What we assess against comes out of your brief, not a template. And where the assessment needs depth we haven’t got in-house, we bring in someone from our bench who has done that job — a sector specialist, an engineer, whoever the brief actually demands.
Most screening tests whether someone can talk about the job. Ours tests whether they’ve done what your role actually requires.
A generalist recruiter can check a CV against a spec. Only someone who has sold in your sector can tell whether the numbers were earned or inherited, whether the accounts they name are the ones that matter, and what they’d struggle with in your business.
If yours isn’t here, ask it on the call. We’d rather tell you no early than sell you a search you don’t need.
Yes. We score for whether a candidate holds live relationships inside authorities, whether they have personally authored a submission or only contributed to one, and whether they understand the statutory duty behind the spend.
That’s often the deciding criterion. A business developer who can answer a hard question about delivery quality in the room, rather than escalating it, protects the relationship as well as opening it.
We work on contingency for most roles — no fee unless you hire. The fee is a percentage of first-year salary and we agree it in writing before anything starts. We aren’t the cheapest option in the market and we don’t try to be; what you’re paying for is the research, the screening and the report.
Tell us on the call. If you’ve someone promising we’d rather pressure-test them than run a search you don’t need. We’ll be straight with you about whether it’s worth doing at all.
For 21 days, yes. It’s what makes the approach possible — nobody writes a page for each candidate and records a video on a role four agencies are racing. After 21 days the role is yours to run however you like.
If they leave, or you exit them, inside six months of starting, we run the search again at no fee. Full terms are confirmed in writing before we begin.
The UK, the United States and Australia. Most of our searches are field or hybrid roles outside the major cities, which is where the agencies chasing volume tend not to look.
A limited number. The research and the reports take real time, and doing eight searches badly is worse for everyone than doing three properly. If we can’t give a role the attention it needs we’ll say so.
A researched Talent Map for your role, built from scratch, and fifteen minutes to walk through it. Yours whether you use us or not.
No fee, no obligation.
The map takes days. The search starts the moment you say go.
No sales deck. No hard sell. Just an honest conversation about the role.